Most states lack key protections for franchisees

WAMS_Map

Our new, comprehensive guide to state franchising laws finds that 32 states do not have laws that protect small-business franchisees from abusive franchisor practices. The analysis of franchise laws, available here, allows current and potential franchisees to better understand franchise-specific legal protections, which are too scarce.

See the state-by-state guide:
www.wearemainst.org/map  

To spur reform, We Are Main St. is reaching out to every member of the legislatures in 49 states, calling on them to establish franchisee-specific protections where there are none and strengthen laws where they exist. Working with franchisees, the group helped push through the nation’s strongest pro-franchisee legislation in California last year and is not contacting lawmakers there. Hawaii, Minnesota and Pennsylvania are currently considering legislation to strengthen franchisee rights.

“There are unique risks inherent in franchising because of  the profound imbalance of power between franchisors—often large, multinational companies like McDonald’s—and small-business franchise owners,” said Joan Moriarty, Director of We Are Main St. “Hardworking franchisees should have the necessary, common-sense protections that create an even playing field. These changes promote stability and prosperity for small business owners and the people they employ.”

Previously,

Continue Reading

Small Business Investment Protection Act now law in California

CALIFORNIA STATEHOUSE

California now has one of the country’s strongest franchisee protection laws after Gov. Jerry Brown signed the Small Business Investment Protection Act earlier this month. The signature capped years of effort by franchisees to pass franchisee rights legislation in the Golden State.

“The law protects franchise owners from franchisors who seek to terminate their business on a whim or from franchisors who desire to take possession of a lucrative franchise without compensating the franchise owner,” wrote Don Sniegowski on franchisee news site Blue Mau Mau.

Under the new law:

  • It will be harder for franchisors to terminate franchisees, and franchisees will have more time to fix most violations before they can be terminated.
  • Franchisors will have to buy certain items from franchisees if they terminate or refuse to renew a franchise. This means franchisees will not lose every dollar they invested if a franchisor terminates or refuses to renew them.
  • Franchisees will have an easier time selling their units: Franchisors will have to approve proposed sales if the buyer is qualified and the franchisee follows the franchisor’s transfer process.

The Service Employees International Union joined forces with franchisees to press for the bill.

Continue Reading

NY Times urges ‘Fairness for Franchise Businesses and Workers’

browncrop

The New York Times is urging Calif. Gov. Jerry Brown to sign the Small Business Investment Protection Act (AB 525):

…developments in franchise law in recent decades have increasingly reduced the power of franchisees in dealings with their corporate parents. The result has been lower franchisee profits and lower worker pay, while corporate profits and executive compensation soar.

Worse, the imbalance of power has been largely impervious to reform, until now. A bill in California awaiting the signature of Gov. Jerry Brown would strengthen the legal rights of franchisees in the operation, sale and closing of their businesses.

The bill prohibits the most egregious corporate practices, including the termination of franchises for minor violations of the franchise agreement. Such terminations can ruin a franchisee, but benefit the corporate parent, by allowing the corporation to sell the franchisee’s location at a higher price to a new owner.

The Times notes that the problem goes far beyond California and mentions the petition to the Federal Trade Commission seeking an investigation into abusive franchisor practices. “By signing the California bill, the governor would help in the drive to improve profits and pay at franchise businesses and show the federal government where it needs to go at the national level.”

You can take action to make a difference for franchisee rights: Urge Gov.

Continue Reading

California Legislature unanimously passes franchisee rights bill

senate vote tally08_27_2015

The California State Legislature has sent the California Small Business Investment Protection Act to Gov. Jerry Brown, and franchisees are urging the governor to sign it. The Assembly passed the measure 79-0 on Aug. 31 after the State Senate passed the bill 34-0 on August 28.

Noting bipartisan backing for the measure, Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson, D-Santa Barbara, said before the Senate vote that the bill will “help bring balance to the franchisee-franchisor relationship,” adding that it “provides needed protections against unwarranted actions by a franchisor.” Specifically, the bill, AB 525, strengthens protections against termination of franchisees; enhances franchisees’ ability to sell their businesses; and requires franchisor payments to franchisees if they do terminate or refuse to renew franchise agreements.

Overwhelming support for the bill prompted the franchisor lobby, the International Franchise Association, to stop its campaign against AB 525. The Coalition of Franchisee Associations and the IFA issued a joint letter stating that “the bill will further strengthen franchising as an engine for economic opportunity in California.”

Franchisees are signing onto a letter to Gov. Brown urging him to sign the Act. Brown vetoed a franchisee rights bill last year.

Continue Reading